Radeon Pro V520 vs Tesla A100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.69
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores79362304
Core clock speed1110 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate550.6230.4
Floating-point processing power17.62 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs496144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eHBM2
Maximum RAM amount40 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 225 Watt

Tesla A100 has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 15.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 239 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.