Tesla A100 vs Radeon Pro V340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 August 2018 (6 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35847936
Core clock speed852 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0550.6
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS17.62 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs224496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB40 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2018 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 260 Watt

Pro V340 has 13% lower power consumption.

Tesla A100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V340 and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V340
Radeon Pro V340
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.