Radeon 680M vs Tesla A100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.13
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7936768
Core clock speed1110 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate550.6105.6
Floating-point processing power17.62 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs49648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla A100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 680M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 926 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.