A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Radeon 680M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.13no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 November 2022 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686912
Core clock speed2000 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6609.1
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs48432
Tensor Coresno data432
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1512 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,935 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 8 November 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 1 month, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 925 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.