Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
50.53
+54.9%

TITAN Xp outperforms RTX 4000 Max-Q by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
RTX 4000 Max-Q RTX 4000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.53no data
Power efficiency13.9128.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1405 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate379.7220.8
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s416.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN Xp 50.53
+54.9%
RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+54.9%
RTX 4000 Max-Q 12539

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+47.7%
88
−47.7%
1440p70−75
+52.2%
46
−52.2%
4K85−90
+51.8%
56
−51.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.22no data
1440p17.13no data
4K14.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and RTX 4000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 48% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 52% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 52% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 50.53 32.62
Recency 6 April 2017 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 54.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
vs
HD 8870 OEM Radeon HD 8870 OEM
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
vs
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
HD 6990 Radeon HD 6990
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
ATI HD 5770 Mac Edition Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU M2 Max 30-Core GPU
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
GT 610 OEM GeForce GT 610 OEM
vs
G210 OEM GeForce G210 OEM
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 3070 SUPER RTX 3070 SUPER

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 4673 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.