Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs TITAN V CEO Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V CEO Edition with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V CEO Edition
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.02
+146%

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms T2000 Max-Q by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.1930.96
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1200 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6103.7
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V CEO Edition 44.02
+146%
T2000 Max-Q 17.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+146%
T2000 Max-Q 6901

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+146%
57
−146%
1440p60−65
+131%
26
−131%
4K90−95
+137%
38
−137%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+0%
53
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 69
+0%
69
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+0%
25
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+0%
47
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how TITAN V CEO Edition and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 146% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 131% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 137% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.02 17.88
Recency 21 June 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 40 Watt

TITAN V CEO Edition has a 146.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 525% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
ATI V7760 FirePro V7760
vs
Arc 3 A370M Arc 3 A370M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 67 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.