Radeon PRO W7700 vs T550 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T550 Mobile with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

T550 Mobile
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 23 Watt
12.50

PRO W7700 outperforms T550 Mobile by a whopping 299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.20
Power efficiency37.9018.29
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243072
Core clock speed1065 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate106.6499.2
Floating-point processing power3.41 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T550 Mobile 12.50
PRO W7700 49.84
+299%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T550 Mobile 4823
PRO W7700 19227
+299%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−280%
190−200
+280%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.26

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−291%
270−280
+291%
Hitman 3 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−293%
220−230
+293%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−291%
270−280
+291%
Hitman 3 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−293%
220−230
+293%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
−281%
160−170
+281%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−291%
270−280
+291%
Hitman 3 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−293%
220−230
+293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
−289%
140−150
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−275%
75−80
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−283%
180−190
+283%
Hitman 3 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−285%
250−260
+285%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%

This is how T550 Mobile and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 280% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.50 49.84
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 190 Watt

T550 Mobile has 726.1% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 298.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the T550 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.