Radeon PRO W7700 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Place in the ranking	285	61
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	55.86
Power efficiency	75.24	18.28
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	3072
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	91.20	499.2
Floating-point processing power	2.918 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	64	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −141%	140−150 +141%
1440p	33 −142%	80−85 +142%
4K	81 −147%	200−210 +147%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.14
1440p	no data	12.49
4K	no data	5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−150%

80−85
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −150%	110−120 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 −155%	120−130 +155%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −150%	100−105 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Far Cry 5	65 −146%	160−170 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −145%	130−140 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −144%	300−310 +144%
Hitman 3	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 −150%	150−160 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −145%	130−140 +145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	59 −154%	150−160 +154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 −141%	130−140 +141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −150%	110−120 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 −150%	70−75 +150%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −150%	100−105 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Far Cry 5	59 −154%	150−160 +154%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −145%	130−140 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −144%	300−310 +144%
Hitman 3	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Horizon Zero Dawn	47 −155%	120−130 +155%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −146%	170−180 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −145%	130−140 +145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	44 −150%	110−120 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 −154%	180−190 +154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	47 −155%	120−130 +155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −150%	110−120 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 −138%	50−55 +138%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Far Cry 5	56 −150%	140−150 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −145%	130−140 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −144%	300−310 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −143%	90−95 +143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −137%	45−50 +137%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
Hitman 3	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 −150%	80−85 +150%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −143%	90−95 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −142%	80−85 +142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −150%	45−50 +150%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −150%	95−100 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	41 −144%	100−105 +144%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −152%	280−290 +152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 −150%	30−33 +150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Hitman 3	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −152%	260−270 +152%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −135%	40−45 +135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −141%	65−70 +141%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%

This is how T1200 Mobile and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 141% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 142% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 147% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.43	49.84
Recency	12 April 2021	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	190 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 955.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 156.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.