Radeon HD 7950 vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Radeon HD 7950, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.20
+63.4%

T1200 Mobile outperforms HD 7950 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.47
Power efficiency14.584.24
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameno dataTahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)31 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241792
Compute unitsno data28
Core clock speed855 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data89.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
ZeroCore-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.20
+63.4%
HD 7950 12.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7784
+63.4%
HD 7950 4764

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+35.1%
HD 7950 7500

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
1440p34
+88.9%
18−21
−88.9%
4K109
+67.7%
65−70
−67.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data12.83
1440pno data24.94
4Kno data6.91

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%
Hitman 3 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+75%
16−18
−75%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%
Hitman 3 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+75%
12−14
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%
Hitman 3 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+80%
35−40
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+80%
35−40
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+90%
10−11
−90%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+70.8%
65−70
−70.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+68.6%
70−75
−68.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+71.7%
60−65
−71.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

This is how T1200 Mobile and HD 7950 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 69% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 89% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 68% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.20 12.36
Recency 12 April 2021 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 63.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 110.5% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7950 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 7950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 7950
Radeon HD 7950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 421 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.