FirePro W5170M vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 with FirePro W5170M, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
43.22
+658%

RX 7600 outperforms W5170M by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85602
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation93.26no data
Power efficiency18.07no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33Tropo
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)25 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed1720 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Wattno data
Texture fill rate339.837.00
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12840
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 43.22
+658%
W5170M 5.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16620
+659%
W5170M 2191

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600 43430
+935%
W5170M 4197

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600 32404
+1014%
W5170M 2909

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600 183336
+860%
W5170M 19095

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
+430%
27
−430%
1440p67
+738%
8−9
−738%
4K37
+825%
4−5
−825%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.88no data
1440p4.01no data
4K7.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 135
+938%
12−14
−938%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+1245%
10−12
−1245%
Elden Ring 155
+1007%
14−16
−1007%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+541%
16−18
−541%
Counter-Strike 2 108
+731%
12−14
−731%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+436%
10−12
−436%
Forza Horizon 4 284
+1135%
21−24
−1135%
Metro Exodus 161
+1050%
14−16
−1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+388%
16−18
−388%
Valorant 170−180
+994%
16−18
−994%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+541%
16−18
−541%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+592%
12−14
−592%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+355%
10−12
−355%
Dota 2 150
+689%
18−20
−689%
Elden Ring 150−160
+1000%
14−16
−1000%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+274%
27−30
−274%
Fortnite 180−190
+438%
30−35
−438%
Forza Horizon 4 230
+900%
21−24
−900%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+689%
18−20
−689%
Metro Exodus 119
+750%
14−16
−750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+331%
45−50
−331%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+388%
16−18
−388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+772%
18−20
−772%
Valorant 170−180
+994%
16−18
−994%
World of Tanks 270−280
+207%
90−95
−207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+541%
16−18
−541%
Counter-Strike 2 81
+523%
12−14
−523%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+309%
10−12
−309%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+274%
27−30
−274%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+765%
21−24
−765%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+331%
45−50
−331%
Valorant 170−180
+994%
16−18
−994%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 77
+1440%
5−6
−1440%
Elden Ring 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+1440%
5−6
−1440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
World of Tanks 270−280
+566%
40−45
−566%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+756%
9−10
−756%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+467%
9−10
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+1058%
12−14
−1058%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+1333%
9−10
−1333%
Metro Exodus 118
+1867%
6−7
−1867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+1129%
7−8
−1129%
Valorant 140−150
+847%
14−16
−847%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Dota 2 82
+382%
16−18
−382%
Elden Ring 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+382%
16−18
−382%
Metro Exodus 38
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+788%
16−18
−788%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
+382%
16−18
−382%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Fortnite 60−65
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Valorant 75−80
+1420%
5−6
−1420%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX 7600 and W5170M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 430% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 738% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 825% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600 is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.22 5.70
Recency 24 May 2023 25 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

RX 7600 has a 658.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5170M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while FirePro W5170M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
AMD FirePro W5170M
FirePro W5170M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2049 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 82 votes

Rate FirePro W5170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.