Quadro T1000 vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.22
+20.3%

T1200 Mobile outperforms T1000 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking276327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.6523.14
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed855 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)50 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10000 MHz8000 MHz
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.22
+20.3%
Quadro T1000 16.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7774
+20.3%
Quadro T1000 6463

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
1440p33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
4K109
+21.1%
90−95
−21.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Elden Ring 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+27.1%
70−75
−27.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Valorant 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Dota 2 86
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
Elden Ring 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Far Cry 5 67
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Fortnite 100−110
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Valorant 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
World of Tanks 230−240
+22.6%
190−200
−22.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 107
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Valorant 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Elden Ring 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+22.9%
140−150
−22.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
World of Tanks 130−140
+24.5%
110−120
−24.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Dota 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Elden Ring 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 109
+21.1%
90−95
−21.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Fortnite 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Valorant 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 31% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 22% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.22 16.81
Recency 12 April 2021 27 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 50 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 20.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has 90% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 422 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.