Quadro K2200 vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro K2200, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
17.45
+118%

T1200 Mobile outperforms K2200 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.34
Power efficiency14.589.33
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$395.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed855 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)68 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.96
Floating-point processing powerno data1.439 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1200 Mobile 17.45
+118%
Quadro K2200 7.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7798
+118%
Quadro K2200 3571

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+142%
24−27
−142%
1440p32
+129%
14−16
−129%
4K90
+125%
40−45
−125%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data16.49
1440pno data28.27
4Kno data9.89

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+142%
45−50
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+126%
35−40
−126%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+142%
45−50
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Far Cry 5 65
+141%
27−30
−141%
Fortnite 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Valorant 140−150
+118%
65−70
−118%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+126%
35−40
−126%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+142%
45−50
−142%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+129%
100−105
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Dota 2 114
+128%
50−55
−128%
Far Cry 5 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Fortnite 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Valorant 140−150
+118%
65−70
−118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+126%
35−40
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Dota 2 107
+138%
45−50
−138%
Far Cry 5 56
+133%
24−27
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Valorant 140−150
+118%
65−70
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+128%
60−65
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+127%
75−80
−127%
Valorant 170−180
+124%
80−85
−124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry 5 41
+128%
18−20
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Valorant 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 109
+142%
45−50
−142%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Quadro K2200 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 142% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 129% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.45 7.99
Recency 12 April 2021 22 July 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 68 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 118.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K2200, on the other hand, has 39.7% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro K2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 432 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1200 Mobile or Quadro K2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.