Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs Riva TNT2 M64

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV5 B6NV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 1999 (25 years ago)28 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed125 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors15 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate0.251.100
ROPs22
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount16 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.09.0a
OpenGL1.21.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 1999 28 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 250 nm 150 nm

NVS 280 PCI has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 and Quadro NVS 280 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 M64 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64
Riva TNT2 M64
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.