RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E4690

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1087not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.43no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV730AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2009 (15 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3207424
Core clock speed600 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors514 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs32232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2009 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 110 Watt

ATI E4690 has 266.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E4690 and RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E4690 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.