HD Graphics P3000 vs Riva TNT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameNV4Sandy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 March 1998 (26 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed90 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors7 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm32 nm
Texture fill rate0.1816.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2592 TFLOPS
ROPs22
TMUs212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed110 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.76 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 March 1998 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 350 nm 32 nm

HD Graphics P3000 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 993.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT and HD Graphics P3000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT
Intel HD Graphics P3000
HD Graphics P3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 66 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 vote

Rate HD Graphics P3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.