UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M with UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), including specs and performance data.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.54

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms 320M by a whopping 1233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1215538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.63no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameC89Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1400 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 7.20
+1233%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 320M 1852
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 18749
+912%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+0%
21
+0%
1440p0−112

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−333%
26
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−70%
17
+70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GeForce 320M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 7.20
Recency 1 April 2010 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 1233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 330 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.