UHD Graphics vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.06

UHD Graphics outperforms ATI Xpress 200M by a whopping 9200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472602
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Power efficiencyno data38.91
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRC410Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2005 (19 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6256
Core clock speed336 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6712.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.06
UHD Graphics 5.58
+9200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
UHD Graphics 2151
+9677%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−9186%
2600−2650
+9186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−9186%
2600−2650
+9186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−9186%
2600−2650
+9186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.06 5.58
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has a 9200% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6107 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.