Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs ATI Radeon X300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.29
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV370G71
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)24 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed375 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors107 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate1.50012.00
ROPs416
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz605 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s38.72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 24 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 145 Watt

ATI X300 has 302.8% lower power consumption.

FX 4500 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 and Quadro FX 4500 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4500 X2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2
Quadro FX 4500 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 30 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4500 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.