ATI Radeon X300 vs Quadro FX 4500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1204not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.38no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG70RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 July 2005 (19 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed430 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors302 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)109 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate10.321.500
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed525 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2005 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 109 Watt 36 Watt

FX 4500 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI X300, on the other hand, has 202.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4500 and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Quadro FX 4500
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.