ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon X1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1447not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.32no data
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV516Redwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2007 (18 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data400
Core clock speed635 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors105 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate2.54015.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps900 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 69 Watt

ATI X1600 has 155.6% lower power consumption.

ATI V4800, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 is a desktop card while FirePro V4800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600
ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 58 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1600 or FirePro V4800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.