ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon X1600
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | RV516 | Redwood |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2007 (17 years ago) | 26 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $129 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 400 |
| Core clock speed | 635 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 627 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.540 | 13.00 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 0.52 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MBps | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 43 Watt |
ATI X1600 has 59.3% lower power consumption.
ATI V3800, on the other hand, has a 125% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon X1600 is a desktop card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
