ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT vs ATI Radeon X1050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1437not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRV370R420
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2006 (18 years ago)21 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors107 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.6008.000
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0b (9_2)
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm

ATI X1050 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and All-In-Wonder X800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT
All-In-Wonder X800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.