ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs ATI X1050

Place in the ranking	1436	1355
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.38	0.43
Architecture	Rage 9 (2003−2006)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	RV370	RV530
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2006 (17 years ago)	1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed	400 MHz	500 MHz
Number of transistors	107 million	157 million
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	41 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.600	2.000
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	4	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	333 MHz	390 MHz
Memory bandwidth	5.328 GB/s	12.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	2.0	2.0
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X1050 0.13

ATI X1600 PRO 0.25
+92.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1050 49

ATI X1600 PRO 98
+100%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.13	0.25
Recency	7 December 2006	1 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	256 MB
Chip lithography	110 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	41 Watt

ATI X1050 has 70.8% lower power consumption.

ATI X1600 PRO, on the other hand, has a 92.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon X1600 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.