Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.01
+12.3%

RX Vega M GL outperforms T500 Mobile by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7334.50
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280896
Core clock speed931 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8894.92
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
1440p16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%
4K18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+11.8%
50−55
−11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+9.9%
130−140
−9.9%
Dota 2 65−70
−30.4%
90
+30.4%
Fortnite 55−60
+11.8%
50−55
−11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+16.1%
31
−16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−12%
28
+12%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
−8.7%
75
+8.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+11.8%
50−55
−11.8%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+25%
28
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL is 7% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GL is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 43% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 30% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 14 tests (31%)
  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (7%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.01 8.91
Recency 1 February 2018 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 12.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX 570 X2 570 X2
GTX 1060 5 GB NVIDIA GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
GTX 1060 5 GB NVIDIA GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 7990 XTX 7990 XTX
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
7600 GS 7600 GS
RTX 3070 3070
vs
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
vs
RX 6650M 6650M
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU core GPU
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 3070 Ti 16 GB
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
HD 6730M 6730M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.