Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.73

T1000 Mobile outperforms RX Vega M GL by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6723.26
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed931 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8869.84
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.235 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.73
T1000 Mobile 14.64
+67.7%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3901
T1000 Mobile 6540
+67.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−80%
63
+80%
4K27−30
−77.8%
48
+77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Fortnite 55−60
−54.4%
85−90
+54.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−73.5%
55−60
+73.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−43.8%
200−210
+43.8%
Dota 2 65−70
−67.6%
114
+67.6%
Fortnite 55−60
−54.4%
85−90
+54.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−88.9%
68
+88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−73.5%
55−60
+73.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−152%
63
+152%
Dota 2 65−70
−57.4%
107
+57.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−73.5%
55−60
+73.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−40%
35
+40%
Fortnite 55−60
−54.4%
85−90
+54.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Dota 2 35−40
−37.1%
48
+37.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Fortnite 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 80% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 152% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 17 tests (27%)
  • there's a draw in 46 tests (73%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.73 14.64
Recency 1 February 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 67.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
GT 740 740
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 750 750
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
Pro 560X 560X
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
vs
RX 590 590
RTX 2060 Super 2060 Super
vs
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
vs
RX 5600M 5600M
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
Graphics Graphics
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
vs
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
Arc A370M A370M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2
22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
165 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro T1000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.