Quadro M1200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M620 Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro M1200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.09
+19.8%

RX Vega M GL outperforms M1200 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6912.88
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 22GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed931 MHz1093 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8843.72
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.399 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.09
+19.8%
Quadro M1200 8.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3878
+19.8%
Quadro M1200 3236

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
4K12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Fortnite 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
World of Tanks 140−150
+15.1%
120−130
−15.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Elden Ring 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Quadro M1200 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.09 8.42
Recency 1 February 2018 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 19.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M1200, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
HD 7870 Radeon HD 7870
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 355 votes

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.