GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	451	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	10.69	27.92
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1024
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	95.04
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.09

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3878

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+101%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −119%	59 +119%
1440p	21−24 −105%	43 +105%
4K	12−14 −108%	25 +108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite	55−60 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −150%	90 +150%
Fortnite	55−60 −81.4%	100−110 +81.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −111%	76 +111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −74.4%	130−140 +74.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −113%	60−65 +113%
World of Tanks	140−150 −60.7%	230−240 +60.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −211%	112 +211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −74.4%	130−140 +74.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −100%	60−65 +100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60
−86.4%

110−120

+86.4%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −70%	30−35 +70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −70%	30−35 +70%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	20−22 −160%	52 +160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−12

−90.9%

21−24
+90.9%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +0%	59 +0%
Elden Ring	57 +0%	57 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +0%	95 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +0%	30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +0%	32 +0%
Elden Ring	73 +0%	73 +0%
Far Cry 5	70 +0%	70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +0%	75 +0%
Metro Exodus	45 +0%	45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +0%	29 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +0%	52 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	29 +0%	29 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	63 +0%	63 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
World of Tanks	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +0%	22 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 119% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 105% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 211% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.09	20.28
Recency	1 February 2018	23 April 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 101% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.