GeForce MX450 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

Place in the ranking	603	457
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.57	26.80
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 October 2017 (7 years ago)	1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	896
Core clock speed	no data	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1575 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	no data	100.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	64.03 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 9 5.54

GeForce MX450 9.68
+74.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 9 4380

GeForce MX450 8250
+88.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 9 12628

GeForce MX450 22831
+80.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 9 2789

GeForce MX450 4725
+69.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 9 19255

GeForce MX450 27570
+43.2%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 9 131922

GeForce MX450 335125
+154%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 9 872

GeForce MX450 1900
+118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 −75%	28 +75%
1440p	10−12 −90%	19 +90%
4K	16−18 −75%	28 +75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−256%

32
+256%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −144%	22 +144%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −77.8%	60−65 +77.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Metro Exodus	21 −162%	55 +162%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −200%	45 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 −60%	30−35 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −91.8%	94 +91.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −44.4%	13 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −77.8%	60−65 +77.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −142%	29 +142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Metro Exodus	16 −131%	37 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 −100%	40 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −36.8%	24−27 +36.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −81.6%	89 +81.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −77.8%	60−65 +77.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −108%	25 +108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 −50%	30 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −150%	20 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +600%	7 −600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−107%

31
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −180%	40−45 +180%
Hitman 3	10−11 −80%	18 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −69.4%	60−65 +69.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−160%

26
+160%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Hitman 3	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −242%	40−45 +242%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−50%

9−10
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

This is how RX Vega 9 and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX450 is 75% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX450 is 90% faster in 1440p
GeForce MX450 is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 9 is 600% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 9 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
GeForce MX450 is ahead in 65 tests (93%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.54	9.68
Recency	26 October 2017	1 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX450, on the other hand, has a 74.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.