Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.01

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488400
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Power efficiency41.35no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVegano data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speedno data1366 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1442 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 MB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data
Vulkan-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.01
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.44
+38.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3743
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+71%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%
1440p17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
4K9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Elden Ring 18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−25%
40−45
+25%
Metro Exodus 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Valorant 44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Elden Ring 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 30
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Fortnite 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Metro Exodus 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
−31.6%
75−80
+31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Valorant 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
World of Tanks 48
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Dota 2 48
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−33.8%
95−100
+33.8%
Valorant 37
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Elden Ring 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
World of Tanks 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Valorant 39
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Elden Ring 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−20%
12−14
+20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 30% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 24% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 12.44
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 38.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1260 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 124 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.