GeForce GTX 580 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
36.84
+207%

RX Vega 64 outperforms GTX 580 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.802.10
Power efficiency8.573.37
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF110
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)9 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX Vega 64 has 938% better value for money than GTX 580.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1247 MHz772 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt244 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate395.849.41
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS1.581 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s192.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 64 36.84
+207%
GTX 580 11.99

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 14194
+207%
GTX 580 4621

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 64 30824
+408%
GTX 580 6065

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 64 55262
+152%
GTX 580 21941

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 64 22501
+353%
GTX 580 4970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p160−170
+202%
53
−202%
Full HD119
+20.2%
99
−20.2%
1200p230−240
+195%
78
−195%
1440p82
+242%
24−27
−242%
4K54
+238%
16−18
−238%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.19
+20.2%
5.04
−20.2%
1440p6.09
+242%
20.79
−242%
4K9.24
+238%
31.19
−238%
  • RX Vega 64 has 20% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 242% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 238% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+280%
20−22
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+239%
21−24
−239%
Atomic Heart 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Battlefield 5 161
+229%
45−50
−229%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+280%
20−22
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+239%
21−24
−239%
Far Cry 5 110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Fortnite 150−160
+130%
65−70
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+248%
45−50
−248%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+233%
30−33
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
Valorant 315
+209%
100−110
−209%
Atomic Heart 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Battlefield 5 146
+198%
45−50
−198%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+280%
20−22
−280%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+68.9%
160−170
−68.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+239%
21−24
−239%
Dota 2 150
+94.8%
75−80
−94.8%
Far Cry 5 104
+174%
35−40
−174%
Fortnite 150−160
+130%
65−70
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+229%
45−50
−229%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+233%
30−33
−233%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+172%
40−45
−172%
Metro Exodus 73
+217%
21−24
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+340%
30−33
−340%
Valorant 293
+187%
100−110
−187%
Battlefield 5 139
+184%
45−50
−184%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+280%
20−22
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+239%
21−24
−239%
Dota 2 138
+79.2%
75−80
−79.2%
Far Cry 5 98
+158%
35−40
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+167%
45−50
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+233%
30−33
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+157%
30−33
−157%
Valorant 140
+37.3%
100−110
−37.3%
Fortnite 150−160
+130%
65−70
−130%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+178%
85−90
−178%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+300%
16−18
−300%
Metro Exodus 46
+254%
12−14
−254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+154%
65−70
−154%
Valorant 263
+114%
120−130
−114%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+200%
30−33
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Far Cry 5 81
+238%
24−27
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+263%
27−30
−263%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+205%
20−22
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
Fortnite 85−90
+267%
24−27
−267%
Atomic Heart 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+223%
21−24
−223%
Metro Exodus 46
+557%
7−8
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+243%
14−16
−243%
Valorant 205
+242%
60−65
−242%
Battlefield 5 59
+293%
14−16
−293%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Dota 2 96
+134%
40−45
−134%
Far Cry 5 44
+267%
12−14
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+247%
18−20
−247%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+291%
10−12
−291%
Fortnite 40−45
+282%
10−12
−282%

This is how RX Vega 64 and GTX 580 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 64 is 202% faster in 900p
  • RX Vega 64 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 is 195% faster in 1200p
  • RX Vega 64 is 242% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 is 238% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 64 is 557% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX Vega 64 surpassed GTX 580 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.84 11.99
Recency 7 August 2017 9 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 244 Watt

RX Vega 64 has a 207.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 580, on the other hand, has 20.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3
741 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
477 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce GTX 580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.