GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Radeon RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 9
VS
GTX 460 GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 v2 GTX 465 GTX 470 GTX 480 GTX 490 GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti GTX 960

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce GTX 465, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.04

GTX 465 outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GTX 465 GTX 465

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.15
Power efficiency27.892.38
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega RenoirGF100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)31 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384352
Core clock speed400 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data26.75
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8554 TFLOPS
Compute performanceno data30x
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidthno data102.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−5%
21−24
+5%
1440p28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%
4K18
+0%
18−21
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data13.29
1440pno data9.30
4Kno data15.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Hitman 3 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Metro Exodus 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Metro Exodus 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
−10%
55−60
+10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GTX 465 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 5% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 465 is 7% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.04 6.87
Recency 7 January 2020 31 May 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 465, on the other hand, has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R9 M470 Radeon R9 M470
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
NVS 4200M NVS 4200M
vs
R6 Graphics Radeon R6 Graphics
GMA X4500 GMA X4500
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
vs
GT 335M GeForce GT 335M
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
R5 340X OEM Radeon R5 340X OEM
vs
Parhelia PCI
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
vs
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 674 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.