Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking605not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRavenN17E-Q5 Max-Q
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7042048
Core clock speed300 MHz1101 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1366 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared6006 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Quadro P5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Quadro P5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
Quadro P5000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1761 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 10 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.