Radeon R7 350 vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon HD 7730 Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7770 Radeon HD 8730 OEM Radeon HD 8740 OEM Radeon HD 8760 OEM Radeon R7 250E Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 Radeon R7 450 OEM Radeon R9 255 OEM Radeon RX 540 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon R7 350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
4.71

R7 350 outperforms RX Vega 11 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
R7 350 R7 350

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.716.98
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRavenCape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704512
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0425.60
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
1440p6
+0%
6−7
+0%
4K12
+0%
12−14
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Fortnite 86
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Valorant 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry 5 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.71 4.82
Recency 10 May 2018 6 July 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

R7 350, on the other hand, has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon R7 350.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
ATI HD 5870 Radeon HD 5870
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11
Quadro P620 P620
vs
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
RX 580 OEM RX 580 OEM
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
vs
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
RX 550X RX 550X
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11
RX 560X RX 560X
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 1832 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 498 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Radeon R7 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.