Radeon R7 350 vs RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon R7 350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.48

R7 350 outperforms RX Vega 11 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking607603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.746.97
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRavenCape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704512
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0425.60
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
1440p6
+0%
6−7
+0%
4K9
+0%
9−10
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 8% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.48 5.59
Recency 10 May 2018 6 July 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

R7 350, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon R7 350.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1790 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 485 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.