GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 670MX GTX 675MX GTX 675MX Mac Edition GTX 680M GTX 680MX Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 780M GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 870M GTX 880M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.48

GTX 780M Mac Edition outperforms RX Vega 11 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking618575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.733.77
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRavenGK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041536
Core clock speed300 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04102.0
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS2.448 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs44128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%
1440p6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
4K12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 31
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Fortnite 86
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 26
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−13.6%
100−105
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Dota 2 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Far Cry 5 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Fortnite 31
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
−20%
30−33
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Dota 2 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Valorant 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GTX 780M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M Mac Edition is 7% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780M Mac Edition is 17% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 780M Mac Edition is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.48 6.72
Recency 10 May 2018 8 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 122 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 248.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 780M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 22.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
GTX 560 SE 560 SE
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
GT 520 520
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
GT 440 440
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU GPU
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
Xbox One GPU GPU
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
FirePro W5100 W5100
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
FirePro W5000 W5000
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
Quadro P400 P400
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
Quadro K420 K420
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
Quadro K620 K620

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 1831 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.