GeForce GTS 260M vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking603not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeN10E-GS
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70496
CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed1240 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6017.60
Floating-point performance1.971 gflops0.264 gflops
Gigaflopsno data396

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataUp to 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIVGADual Link DVIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 15 June 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 38 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTS 260M, on the other hand, has 71.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce GTS 260M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GeForce GTS 260M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M
GeForce GTS 260M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1734 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTS 260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.