GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with GeForce 9800M GT SLI, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.27
+169%

RX Vega 11 outperforms 9800M GT SLI by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617893
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.811.08
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameRavenNB9E-GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704192
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+180%
10−12
−180%
1440p5
+400%
1−2
−400%
4K12
+200%
4−5
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Metro Exodus 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Valorant 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Dota 2 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Fortnite 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Metro Exodus 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+170%
20−22
−170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Valorant 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
World of Tanks 85−90
+126%
35−40
−126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Dota 2 42
+950%
4−5
−950%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+130%
20−22
−130%
Valorant 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
World of Tanks 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how RX Vega 11 and 9800M GT SLI compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 180% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is ahead in 45 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.27 1.96
Recency 10 May 2018 15 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 130 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 168.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GeForce 9800M GT SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1826 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce 9800M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.