RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800 XT with RTX A1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 7800 XT
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
63.15
+155%

RX 7800 XT outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30222
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation68.04no data
Power efficiency16.4628.24
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Core clock speed1295 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate583.272.96
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores6016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7800 XT 63.15
+155%
RTX A1000 Mobile 24.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800 XT 24333
+155%
RTX A1000 Mobile 9527

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7800 XT 65611
+334%
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7800 XT 134322
+130%
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7800 XT 49707
+339%
RTX A1000 Mobile 11321

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7800 XT 202773
+186%
RTX A1000 Mobile 70880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD216
+213%
69
−213%
1440p122
+352%
27
−352%
4K70
+159%
27−30
−159%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.31no data
1440p4.09no data
4K7.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 258
+323%
61
−323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 178
+249%
50−55
−249%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 222
+344%
50
−344%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+165%
75−80
−165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+143%
45−50
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
+286%
50
−286%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+113%
50−55
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+148%
60−65
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+67.9%
130−140
−67.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
+170%
45−50
−170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+116%
100−110
−116%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+96.2%
75−80
−96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
+232%
75−80
−232%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+51.5%
95−100
−51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 261
+412%
50−55
−412%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 181
+448%
33
−448%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+165%
75−80
−165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+143%
45−50
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 161
+335%
37
−335%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+113%
50−55
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+148%
60−65
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+67.9%
130−140
−67.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
+170%
45−50
−170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+116%
100−110
−116%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+96.2%
75−80
−96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 398
+357%
87
−357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+51.5%
95−100
−51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130
+155%
50−55
−155%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+532%
25
−532%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+143%
45−50
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+410%
29
−410%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+113%
50−55
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+62%
130−140
−62%
Hitman 3 120−130
+170%
45−50
−170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 274
+154%
100−110
−154%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 340
+347%
76
−347%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+365%
43
−365%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
+458%
26
−458%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+218%
40−45
−218%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 119
+396%
24−27
−396%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+464%
22
−464%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+185%
24−27
−185%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+593%
14−16
−593%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+107%
130−140
−107%
Hitman 3 90−95
+233%
27−30
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 217
+362%
45−50
−362%
Metro Exodus 148
+244%
40−45
−244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+396%
45−50
−396%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+425%
27−30
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+78%
130−140
−78%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+176%
35−40
−176%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+217%
21−24
−217%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+239%
18−20
−239%
Hitman 3 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+87.4%
110−120
−87.4%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+262%
24−27
−262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+392%
24−27
−392%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+500%
12−14
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+780%
5−6
−780%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+231%
12−14
−231%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+429%
30−35
−429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+381%
27−30
−381%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
+570%
10−11
−570%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+220%
20−22
−220%

This is how RX 7800 XT and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 213% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 352% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 159% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 780% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed RTX A1000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.15 24.72
Recency 25 August 2023 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 60 Watt

RX 7800 XT has a 155.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 338.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2950 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.