Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700 XT and Arc A380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7700 XT
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
58.39
+262%

RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A380 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.3244.12
Power efficiency16.3414.75
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 32DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 62% better value for money than Arc A380.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores34561024
Core clock speed1435 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2544 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate549.5131.2
Floating-point processing power35.17 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs21664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores548

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm222 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 58.39
+262%
Arc A380 16.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700 XT 22501
+262%
Arc A380 6219

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7700 XT 57340
+313%
Arc A380 13892

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7700 XT 126733
+135%
Arc A380 53979

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7700 XT 42801
+321%
Arc A380 10174

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7700 XT 201871
+232%
Arc A380 60804

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7700 XT 730434
+56.5%
Arc A380 466666

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD188
+300%
47
−300%
1440p103
+281%
27−30
−281%
4K60
+275%
16−18
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.393.17
1440p4.365.52
4K7.489.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 193
+286%
50−55
−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 165
+170%
61
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 180
+260%
50
−260%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+88.7%
95−100
−88.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+78.7%
60−65
−78.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+295%
40−45
−295%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+62.7%
65−70
−62.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+82.9%
75−80
−82.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+36.6%
160−170
−36.6%
Hitman 3 110−120
+90.3%
60−65
−90.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+65.9%
130−140
−65.9%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+51.5%
100−110
−51.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+52%
75−80
−52%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+124%
100−110
−124%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+30.1%
110−120
−30.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 272
+278%
72
−278%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 149
+303%
37
−303%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+88.7%
95−100
−88.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+78.7%
60−65
−78.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+277%
35−40
−277%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+62.7%
65−70
−62.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+82.9%
75−80
−82.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+36.6%
160−170
−36.6%
Hitman 3 110−120
+90.3%
60−65
−90.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+65.9%
130−140
−65.9%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+51.5%
100−110
−51.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+52%
75−80
−52%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 334
+318%
80
−318%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+90.5%
60−65
−90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+30.1%
110−120
−30.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121
+317%
29
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 132
+326%
31
−326%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+78.7%
60−65
−78.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+307%
30−33
−307%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+62.7%
65−70
−62.7%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+305%
57
−305%
Hitman 3 110−120
+90.3%
60−65
−90.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 216
+315%
52
−315%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 287
+370%
61
−370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+394%
34
−394%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+488%
25
−488%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+52%
75−80
−52%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+121%
55−60
−121%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+100%
45−50
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 98
+216%
30−35
−216%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+226%
30−35
−226%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+100%
30−35
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+281%
21−24
−281%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+97.1%
30−35
−97.1%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+57.9%
170−180
−57.9%
Hitman 3 80−85
+125%
35−40
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 171
+176%
60−65
−176%
Metro Exodus 134
+135%
55−60
−135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+184%
65−70
−184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+208%
35−40
−208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+43.1%
160−170
−43.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+96%
50−55
−96%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+124%
27−30
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Hitman 3 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+46.3%
140−150
−46.3%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+162%
30−35
−162%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+205%
18−20
−205%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+247%
16−18
−247%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+300%
9−10
−300%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+124%
16−18
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+227%
40−45
−227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+155%
35−40
−155%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%

This is how RX 7700 XT and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 300% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 281% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 275% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 488% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed Arc A380 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.39 16.14
Recency 25 August 2023 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 75 Watt

RX 7700 XT has a 261.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has 226.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1521 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.