Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Radeon RX 7600S

Place in the ranking	120	426
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	35.58	18.97
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	no data
GPU code name	Navi 33	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1536
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	246.4	no data
Floating-point processing power	15.77 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	112	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.2	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600S 38.76
+252%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.02

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600S 34218
+385%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600S 79339
+230%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600S 25900
+271%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600S 9203
+363%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100 +156%	39 −156%
1440p	46 +283%	12−14 −283%
4K	26 +271%	7−8 −271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	99 +330%	23 −330%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +295%	21−24 −295%
Elden Ring	130−140 +322%	30−35 −322%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +189%	35−40 −189%
Counter-Strike 2	83 +277%	22 −277%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +271%	14−16 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	228 +307%	56 −307%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +210%	30−33 −210%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +162%	27−30 −162%
Valorant	209 +398%	40−45 −398%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +189%	35−40 −189%
Counter-Strike 2	75 +295%	19 −295%
Cyberpunk 2077	42 +320%	10−11 −320%
Dota 2	122 +239%	36 −239%
Elden Ring	145 +353%	30−35 −353%
Far Cry 5	56 +27.3%	40−45 −27.3%
Fortnite	170−180 +166%	60−65 −166%
Forza Horizon 4	190 +296%	48 −296%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +250%	36 −250%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +210%	30−33 −210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +137%	80−85 −137%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +162%	27−30 −162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +315%	30−35 −315%
Valorant	150−160 +269%	40−45 −269%
World of Tanks	270−280 +80%	150−160 −80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +189%	35−40 −189%
Counter-Strike 2	56 +229%	17 −229%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +289%	9−10 −289%
Dota 2	110 +267%	30−33 −267%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +118%	40−45 −118%
Forza Horizon 4	163 +298%	41 −298%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +137%	80−85 −137%
Valorant	179 +326%	40−45 −326%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +407%	14−16 −407%
Elden Ring	76 +375%	16−18 −375%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +380%	14−16 −380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +289%	45−50 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +322%	9−10 −322%
World of Tanks	240−250 +210%	75−80 −210%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +243%	21−24 −243%
Counter-Strike 2	24 +118%	10−12 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +421%	24−27 −421%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +344%	24−27 −344%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +282%	21−24 −282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +415%	12−14 −415%
Valorant	120−130 +348%	27−30 −348%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Dota 2	75−80 +262%	21−24 −262%
Elden Ring	37 +429%	7−8 −429%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +262%	21−24 −262%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +291%	30−35 −291%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +262%	21−24 −262%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +350%	2−3 −350%
Dota 2	75−80 +262%	21−24 −262%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +338%	12−14 −338%
Fortnite	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +357%	14−16 −357%
Valorant	60−65 +473%	10−12 −473%