Radeon R4 (Beema) vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Radeon R4 (Beema), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm Adreno 690
2018
7 Watt
2.72
+162%

Qualcomm Adreno 690 outperforms R4 (Beema) by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8061101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.64no data
Architectureno dataGCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameno dataBeema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Shared memory++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2.72
+162%
R4 (Beema) 1.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 1049
+163%
R4 (Beema) 399

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2912
+307%
R4 (Beema) 716

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2933
+490%
R4 (Beema) 497

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 16708
+405%
R4 (Beema) 3309

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+213%
8
−213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 690 and R4 (Beema) compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 690 is 213% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 is 1200% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R4 (Beema) is 22% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 690 is ahead in 42 tests (98%)
  • R4 (Beema) is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.72 1.04
Recency 6 December 2018 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has a 161.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Beema) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Beema)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 74 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.