GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GT 240, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
43.08
+3189%

RX 7600 outperforms GT 240 by a whopping 3189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking871030
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.960.01
Power efficiency17.891.30
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33GT215
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)17 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 929500% better value for money than GT 240.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed1720 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105C C
Texture fill rate339.817.60
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12832
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length204 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s54.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1DVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.74.1
OpenGL4.63.2
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 43.08
+3189%
GT 240 1.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16602
+3194%
GT 240 504

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600 114647
+2096%
GT 240 5221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
+468%
25
−468%
1440p67
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
4K35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.893.20
1440p4.0140.00
4K7.6980.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+3600%
4−5
−3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+3300%
4−5
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+9850%
2−3
−9850%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1136%
14−16
−1136%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+3200%
4−5
−3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+1875%
8−9
−1875%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+303%
30−35
−303%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+3300%
4−5
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+9850%
2−3
−9850%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1136%
14−16
−1136%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+3200%
4−5
−3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+2775%
8−9
−2775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+691%
10−12
−691%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+303%
30−35
−303%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+9850%
2−3
−9850%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+1129%
14−16
−1129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+2388%
8−9
−2388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+1018%
10−12
−1018%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+303%
30−35
−303%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+4700%
2−3
−4700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+3229%
7−8
−3229%
Hitman 3 55−60
+700%
7−8
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+2440%
5−6
−2440%
Metro Exodus 118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+4200%
3−4
−4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+3250%
6−7
−3250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+3700%
5−6
−3700%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

This is how RX 7600 and GT 240 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 468% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 3250% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 3400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600 is 9850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600 surpassed GT 240 in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.08 1.31
Recency 24 May 2023 17 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB or 1 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 69 Watt

RX 7600 has a 3188.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 139.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1923 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 916 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.