GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 7600

Place in the ranking	85	1033
Place by popularity	74	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	93.26	0.01
Power efficiency	18.02	1.31
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GT215
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2023 (1 year ago)	17 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$269	$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 932500% better value for money than GT 240.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	96
Core clock speed	1720 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	2655 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,300 million	727 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105C C
Texture fill rate	339.8	17.60
Floating-point processing power	21.75 TFLOPS	0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	8
TMUs	128	32
Ray Tracing Cores	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	204 mm	168 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	54.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	DVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.7	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.2
OpenCL	2.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 43.22
+3199%

GT 240 1.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16620
+3204%

GT 240 503

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600 114647
+2096%

GT 240 5221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	143 +472%	25 −472%
1440p	67 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
4K	37 +3600%	1−2 −3600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	1.88 +70.1%	3.20 −70.1%
1440p	4.01 +896%	40.00 −896%
4K	7.27 +1000%	80.00 −1000%

RX 7600 has 70% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7600 has 896% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7600 has 1000% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	135 +1400%	9−10 −1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	148 +3600%	4−5 −3600%
Elden Ring	155 +15400%	1−2 −15400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +10800%	1−2 −10800%
Counter-Strike 2	108 +1100%	9−10 −1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
Forza Horizon 4	284 +3450%	8−9 −3450%
Metro Exodus	161 +3925%	4−5 −3925%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +1086%	7−8 −1086%
Valorant	170−180 +3400%	5−6 −3400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +10800%	1−2 −10800%
Counter-Strike 2	90 +900%	9−10 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Dota 2	150 +14900%	1−2 −14900%
Elden Ring	150−160 +15300%	1−2 −15300%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +910%	10−11 −910%
Fortnite	180−190 +3560%	5−6 −3560%
Forza Horizon 4	230 +2775%	8−9 −2775%
Grand Theft Auto V	150 +14900%	1−2 −14900%
Metro Exodus	119 +3867%	3−4 −3867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +1379%	14−16 −1379%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +1086%	7−8 −1086%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +2143%	7−8 −2143%
Valorant	170−180 +3400%	5−6 −3400%
World of Tanks	270−280 +896%	27−30 −896%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +10800%	1−2 −10800%
Counter-Strike 2	81 +800%	9−10 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +910%	10−11 −910%
Forza Horizon 4	199 +2388%	8−9 −2388%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +1379%	14−16 −1379%
Valorant	170−180 +3400%	5−6 −3400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	77 +3750%	2−3 −3750%
Elden Ring	90−95 +4450%	2−3 −4450%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 +3750%	2−3 −3750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2088%	8−9 −2088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280 +3800%	7−8 −3800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +3750%	2−3 −3750%
Counter-Strike 2	51 +467%	9−10 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +2680%	5−6 −2680%
Forza Horizon 4	129 +4200%	3−4 −4200%
Metro Exodus	118 +3833%	3−4 −3833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	86 +2767%	3−4 −2767%
Valorant	140−150 +2267%	6−7 −2267%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	22	0−1
Dota 2	82 +447%	14−16 −447%
Elden Ring	40−45	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	82 +447%	14−16 −447%
Metro Exodus	38 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +3450%	4−5 −3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	82 +447%	14−16 −447%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +5000%	1−2 −5000%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +6500%	1−2 −6500%
Fortnite	60−65 +6300%	1−2 −6300%
Forza Horizon 4	69 +3350%	2−3 −3350%
Valorant	75−80 +7500%	1−2 −7500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

This is how RX 7600 and GT 240 compete in popular games:

RX 7600 is 472% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 is 3250% faster in 1440p
RX 7600 is 3600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7600 is 15400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7600 is ahead in 42 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	43.22	1.31
Recency	24 May 2023	17 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB or 1 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	69 Watt