GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon RX 7600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GT 440, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.92
+2046%

RX 7600 outperforms GT 440 by a whopping 2046% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88892
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.540.08
Power efficiency18.142.15
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 33GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 115575% better value for money than GT 440.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed1720 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate339.812.96
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs12816
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length204 mm145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPUno data1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1HDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.92
+2046%
GT 440 2.00

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16558
+2050%
GT 440 770

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600 32404
+3712%
GT 440 850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
+2283%
6−7
−2283%
1440p68
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
4K37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.8813.17
1440p3.9626.33
4K7.2779.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+2367%
6−7
−2367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+2167%
6−7
−2167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+2240%
5−6
−2240%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+2500%
4−5
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+2111%
9−10
−2111%
Hitman 3 90−95
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2063%
8−9
−2063%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2157%
7−8
−2157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+2167%
6−7
−2167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+2500%
4−5
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+2111%
9−10
−2111%
Hitman 3 90−95
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2063%
8−9
−2063%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+2200%
10−11
−2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+2111%
9−10
−2111%
Hitman 3 90−95
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+2050%
8−9
−2050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+2111%
9−10
−2111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+2360%
5−6
−2360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+2230%
10−11
−2230%
Hitman 3 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+2440%
5−6
−2440%
Metro Exodus 118
+2260%
5−6
−2260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+2050%
6−7
−2050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+2133%
9−10
−2133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Hitman 3 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+2275%
8−9
−2275%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%

This is how RX 7600 and GT 440 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 2283% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 2167% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 3600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.92 2.00
Recency 24 May 2023 1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

RX 7600 has a 2046% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 440, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 440 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1818 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1961 vote

Rate GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.