Tesla P10 vs Radeon RX 6900 XTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 21GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed2075 MHz1025 MHz
Boost clock speed2435 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate779.2358.3
Floating-point processing power24.93 TFLOPS11.47 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320240
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1808 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s694.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 250 Watt

RX 6900 XTX has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla P10, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 32% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XTX and Tesla P10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 XTX is a desktop card while Tesla P10 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
Radeon RX 6900 XTX
NVIDIA Tesla P10
Tesla P10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 122 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Tesla P10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.