STG-2000 vs Radeon RX 6900 XTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameNavi 21NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed2075 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed2435 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate779.20.08
Floating-point processing power24.93 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1281
TMUs3201
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6FPM
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)1.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 2 Watt

RX 6900 XTX has an age advantage of 25 years, a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7042.9% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 16400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XTX and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
Radeon RX 6900 XTX
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 128 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 65 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.