Arc A550M vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 XT with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

RX 6750 XT
2022
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
53.98
+120%

RX 6750 XT outperforms Arc A550M by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.77no data
Power efficiency15.0628.56
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 22DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2022 (2 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed2150 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate416.0262.4
Floating-point processing power13.31 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.98
+120%
Arc A550M 24.57

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6750 XT 37609
+162%
Arc A550M 14350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD165
+120%
75−80
−120%
1440p88
+120%
40−45
−120%
4K51
+143%
21−24
−143%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.33no data
1440p6.24no data
4K10.76no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 165
+323%
35−40
−323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+115%
50−55
−115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+129%
40−45
−129%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+119%
75−80
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+112%
45−50
−112%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+226%
35−40
−226%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+90.9%
55−60
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+106%
60−65
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+55.3%
140−150
−55.3%
Hitman 3 110−120
+135%
45−50
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+87.4%
110−120
−87.4%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+82.9%
80−85
−82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+79%
60−65
−79%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+165%
80−85
−165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+42.6%
100−110
−42.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+115%
50−55
−115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+129%
40−45
−129%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+119%
75−80
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+112%
45−50
−112%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+179%
35−40
−179%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+90.9%
55−60
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+106%
60−65
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+55.3%
140−150
−55.3%
Hitman 3 110−120
+135%
45−50
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+87.4%
110−120
−87.4%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+82.9%
80−85
−82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+79%
60−65
−79%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
+280%
80−85
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+115%
50−55
−115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+42.6%
100−110
−42.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+115%
50−55
−115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+129%
40−45
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+112%
45−50
−112%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+151%
35−40
−151%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+90.9%
55−60
−90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+55.3%
140−150
−55.3%
Hitman 3 110−120
+135%
45−50
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
+89.2%
110−120
−89.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260
+225%
80−85
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+160%
50−55
−160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
−3.1%
100−110
+3.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+79%
60−65
−79%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+144%
24−27
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+178%
21−24
−178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+300%
14−16
−300%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+125%
27−30
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+95.6%
130−140
−95.6%
Hitman 3 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 158
+222%
45−50
−222%
Metro Exodus 126
+180%
45−50
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+265%
50−55
−265%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+203%
27−30
−203%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+64.7%
130−140
−64.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Hitman 3 45−50
+137%
18−20
−137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+73.2%
120−130
−73.2%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+204%
24−27
−204%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+333%
6−7
−333%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+142%
30−35
−142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 99
+241%
27−30
−241%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
+273%
10−12
−273%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%

This is how RX 6750 XT and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 120% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 143% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 333% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 3% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • Arc A550M is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.98 24.57
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

RX 6750 XT has a 119.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2527 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.