Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700M with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700M
2021
10 GB GDDR6, 135 Watt
35.16
+3.6%

RX 6700M outperforms Arc A770 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking144155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.32
Power efficiency17.8510.34
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 22DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1489 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6614.4
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs144256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores3632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB16 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 35.16
+3.6%
Arc A770 33.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700M 13548
+3.6%
Arc A770 13075

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700M 33497
Arc A770 41303
+23.3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700M 66973
Arc A770 103295
+54.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700M 27924
Arc A770 32666
+17%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700M 91672
Arc A770 139166
+51.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD121
+4.3%
116
−4.3%
1440p65−70
+0%
65
+0%
4K40−45
−2.5%
41
+2.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data5.06
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+15.4%
65
−15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
+6.5%
92
−6.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+20.8%
140−150
−20.8%
Hitman 3 111
+113%
50−55
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+26.3%
110−120
−26.3%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−25.2%
144
+25.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+40.9%
85−90
−40.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+16.2%
100−110
−16.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+142%
31
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82
+3.8%
79
−3.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+20.8%
140−150
−20.8%
Hitman 3 96
+84.6%
50−55
−84.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+26.3%
110−120
−26.3%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−25.2%
144
+25.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
−38.7%
258
+38.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+28.6%
55−60
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+16.2%
100−110
−16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+66.7%
45
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
−1.4%
72
+1.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+683%
23
−683%
Hitman 3 90
+73.1%
50−55
−73.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+23.1%
121
−23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170
−27.1%
216
+27.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+31.9%
72
−31.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
−15.6%
74
+15.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88
+31.3%
65−70
−31.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+34.7%
45−50
−34.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.1%
40
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−62.2%
60
+62.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+34.5%
140−150
−34.5%
Hitman 3 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−35.1%
100
+35.1%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−37.9%
91
+37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−92.7%
158
+92.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−25%
60
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+22.8%
140−150
−22.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Hitman 3 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+27.3%
130−140
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−93%
83
+93%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−78%
73
+78%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−30.4%
30
+30.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−81%
38
+81%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−93.5%
89
+93.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−118%
37
+118%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%

This is how RX 6700M and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700M is 4% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700M is 683% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 118% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700M is ahead in 54 tests (75%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 18 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.16 33.93
Recency 31 May 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 225 Watt

RX 6700M has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6700M and Arc A770.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700M is a notebook card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5320 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.