Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700S with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700S
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
38.87
+14.6%

RX 6700S outperforms Arc A770 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.32
Power efficiency33.3110.34
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1700 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0614.4
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores2832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700S 38.87
+14.6%
Arc A770 33.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700S 14977
+14.5%
Arc A770 13075

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700S 32662
Arc A770 41303
+26.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700S 75332
Arc A770 103295
+37.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700S 24135
Arc A770 32666
+35.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700S 153853
+10.6%
Arc A770 139166

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
+0.9%
116
−0.9%
1440p64
−1.6%
65
+1.6%
4K45−50
+9.8%
41
−9.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data5.06
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+61.9%
40−45
−61.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+26.2%
65
−26.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
+22.8%
92
−22.8%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+47.2%
50−55
−47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+136%
40−45
−136%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+43.3%
65−70
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+27.5%
140−150
−27.5%
Hitman 3 99
+90.4%
50−55
−90.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−16.1%
144
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+60.2%
85−90
−60.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+21.9%
100−110
−21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+165%
31
−165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 93
+17.7%
79
−17.7%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+47.2%
50−55
−47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+76.2%
40−45
−76.2%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+43.3%
65−70
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+27.5%
140−150
−27.5%
Hitman 3 95
+82.7%
50−55
−82.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−16.1%
144
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
−41%
258
+41%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+21.9%
100−110
−21.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+82.2%
45
−82.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+9.7%
72
−9.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+47.2%
50−55
−47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+726%
23
−726%
Hitman 3 84
+61.5%
50−55
−61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+33.9%
121
−33.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
−37.6%
216
+37.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+16.7%
72
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−25.4%
74
+25.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+51%
45−50
−51%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+51.3%
35−40
−51.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−22.4%
60
+22.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+47.3%
140−150
−47.3%
Hitman 3 49
+58.1%
30−35
−58.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−19%
100
+19%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−26.4%
91
+26.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−69.9%
158
+69.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−7.1%
60
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+31%
140−150
−31%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+53.5%
40−45
−53.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Hitman 3 30−35
+55%
20−22
−55%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+36.4%
130−140
−36.4%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−69.4%
83
+69.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−58.7%
73
+58.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−67.9%
89
+67.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−94.7%
37
+94.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+54.5%
21−24
−54.5%

This is how RX 6700S and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is 1% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700S is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700S is 726% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 95% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is ahead in 56 tests (78%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 16 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.87 33.93
Recency 4 January 2022 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt

RX 6700S has a 14.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700S is a notebook card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 213 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5320 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.