Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 6600S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600S with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600S
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.29
+2.8%

RX 6600S outperforms Arc A750 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.31
Power efficiency27.679.57
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923584
Core clock speed1700 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0537.6
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs112224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Cores2828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600S 32.29
+2.8%
Arc A750 31.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600S 12444
+2.8%
Arc A750 12102

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+1.9%
108
−1.9%
1440p55−60
−5.5%
58
+5.5%
4K35−40
+0%
35
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.68
1440pno data4.98
4Kno data8.26

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+22.6%
62
−22.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−47.5%
90
+47.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−22.6%
140−150
+22.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−22.2%
85−90
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−17.9%
90−95
+17.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−21.3%
100−110
+21.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−11.6%
200−210
+11.6%
Hitman 3 75−80
−25.3%
90−95
+25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−17.9%
170−180
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−24.1%
144
+24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−16.5%
95−100
+16.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−29.9%
160−170
+29.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−9.8%
130−140
+9.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−39.5%
106
+39.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−24.6%
76
+24.6%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−22.6%
140−150
+22.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−22.2%
85−90
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−17.9%
90−95
+17.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−21.3%
100−110
+21.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−11.6%
200−210
+11.6%
Hitman 3 75−80
−25.3%
90−95
+25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−17.9%
170−180
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−23.3%
143
+23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−16.5%
95−100
+16.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−88.2%
239
+88.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−23%
90−95
+23%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−9.8%
130−140
+9.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+68.9%
45
−68.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−13.1%
69
+13.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−22.2%
85−90
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−17.9%
90−95
+17.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+101%
90
−101%
Hitman 3 75−80
−25.3%
90−95
+25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+33.6%
113
−33.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−56.7%
199
+56.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+7.2%
69
−7.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+95.2%
63
−95.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−16.5%
95−100
+16.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−26.5%
85−90
+26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−24.1%
65−70
+24.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
38
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−42.1%
54
+42.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−26.8%
50−55
+26.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−24.4%
50−55
+24.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−18.3%
230−240
+18.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
−28.9%
55−60
+28.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−21.1%
92
+21.1%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−28.4%
86
+28.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−72.6%
145
+72.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−16.3%
57
+16.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
−13.3%
200−210
+13.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−24.6%
75−80
+24.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−31%
35−40
+31%
Hitman 3 27−30
−24.1%
35−40
+24.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−14.1%
190−200
+14.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−81.8%
80
+81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−68.3%
69
+68.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−21.7%
28
+21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−42.9%
30
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−24.5%
61
+24.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−78.7%
84
+78.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%

This is how RX 6600S and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 101% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
  • Arc A750 is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.29 31.41
Recency 4 January 2022 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt

RX 6600S has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6600S and Arc A750.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600S is a notebook card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 852 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.