Radeon RX 7600M XT vs RX 6600S

Place in the ranking	173	150
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.85	19.83
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2048
Core clock speed	1700 MHz	1280 MHz
Boost clock speed	2000 MHz	2469 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.0	316.0
Floating-point processing power	7.168 TFLOPS	20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	128
Ray Tracing Cores	28	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600S 32.37

RX 7600M XT 34.56
+6.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600S 12444

RX 7600M XT 13286
+6.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −16%	116 +16%
1440p	50−55 −10%	55 +10%
4K	30−35 −10%	33 +10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −64.1%	105 +64.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −7.4%	70−75 +7.4%
Elden Ring	110−120 −22.7%	135 +22.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −4.3%	95−100 +4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −40.6%	90 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −7.4%	70−75 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −70%	255 +70%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −34.6%	109 +34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
Valorant	120−130 −7%	130−140 +7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −4.3%	95−100 +4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −28.1%	82 +28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −7.4%	70−75 +7.4%
Dota 2	100−110 +19.1%	89 −19.1%
Elden Ring	110−120 −8.2%	110−120 +8.2%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +25.7%	70 −25.7%
Fortnite	150−160 −4.7%	150−160 +4.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −38.7%	208 +38.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 −24.5%	132 +24.5%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −11.1%	90 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −3.8%	190−200 +3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −8.2%	110−120 +8.2%
Valorant	120−130 −7%	130−140 +7%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.4%	270−280 +0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −4.3%	95−100 +4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +6.7%	60 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −7.4%	70−75 +7.4%
Dota 2	100−110 −5.7%	110−120 +5.7%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −3.4%	90−95 +3.4%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −20%	180 +20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −3.8%	190−200 +3.8%
Valorant	120−130 −7%	130−140 +7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	55−60 −20.7%	70 +20.7%
Elden Ring	60−65 −8.1%	65−70 +8.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −19%	69 +19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −6.5%	30−35 +6.5%
World of Tanks	200−210 −6.3%	220−230 +6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −10%	30−35 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −10%	30−35 +10%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −33.3%	120 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −27.8%	92 +27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −42.3%	74 +42.3%
Valorant	90−95 −9.6%	100−110 +9.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3100%	1 −3100%
Dota 2	60−65 −23.3%	74 +23.3%
Elden Ring	27−30 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −23.3%	74 +23.3%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −34.6%	35 +34.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −23.3%	74 +23.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −8.3%	35−40 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +146%	13 −146%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Dota 2	60−65 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.9%	45−50 +8.9%
Fortnite	40−45 −9.3%	45−50 +9.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −23.1%	64 +23.1%
Valorant	45−50 −10.4%	50−55 +10.4%

This is how RX 6600S and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 16% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 10% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600S is 3100% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 70% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6600S is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
RX 7600M XT is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.37	34.56
Recency	4 January 2022	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	120 Watt

RX 6600S has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6600S and Radeon RX 7600M XT.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.