RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 XT with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 107 Watt
24.80

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RX 6500 XT by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21672
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.3381.58
Power efficiency16.7247.49
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 40% better value for money than RX 6500 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242816
Core clock speed2610 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2815 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate180.2187.4
Floating-point processing power5.765 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6488
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores1622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2248 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.80
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.07
+85.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9569
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17778
+85.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD66
−81.8%
120−130
+81.8%
1440p34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
4K16
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 72
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−85.2%
150−160
+85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−84.6%
120−130
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−79.3%
260−270
+79.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−84.2%
210−220
+84.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−76.5%
150−160
+76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−71.9%
110−120
+71.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−78.6%
150−160
+78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−84.5%
190−200
+84.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−85.2%
150−160
+85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−84.6%
120−130
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−79.3%
260−270
+79.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−84.2%
210−220
+84.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−76.5%
150−160
+76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−71.9%
110−120
+71.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
−77.6%
190−200
+77.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−79.2%
95−100
+79.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−84.5%
190−200
+84.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−79.3%
260−270
+79.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−80%
45−50
+80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−71.9%
110−120
+71.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−80.9%
85−90
+80.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−84.4%
260−270
+84.4%
Hitman 3 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
−81.8%
120−130
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 57
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−85.7%
260−270
+85.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Hitman 3 10
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−81.1%
230−240
+81.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
−80%
45−50
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
−80%
18−20
+80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%

This is how RX 6500 XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 82% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 76% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 69% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.80 46.07
Recency 19 January 2022 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 52.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3206 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.